Marcelo Gallardo accuses the Inter of corrupting the referee to obtain advantages, the lightning response of Cristian Chivu leaves speechless
Marcelo Gallardo, the River Plate coach, triggered a media storm with some very strong statements involving Inter Milan. During a press conference, Gallardo explicitly accused the Nerazzurri club of having bought the referee to encourage his team in one of the recent games against River Plate. His words have been heavy and have raised a wave of indignation both in Italy and in Argentina, with many who wonder if there are really concrete evidence behind his serious accusations.

According to Gallardo, there were clear signs of “manipulation” of the arbitration decisions, which would have favored Inter during the match. River coach said that some choices of the race director, such as the cancellation of a goal valid for the River Plate and the lack of whistle of a penalty kick in favor of his team, could not be the result of a human error, but rather of a “forcing” wanted by external forces. Gallardo insisted that it was not a coincidence that Inter had benefited from these decisions and questioned the integrity of the entire football system.

La reaction of cristian chivu
The accusations of Gallardo did not remain unanswered. Cristian Chivu, former Inter defender and now a member of the club’s technical staff, has promptly reacted to the statements of the Argentine coach. In a statement that left Gallardo and many others speechless, Chivu replied with a simple, but incisive, message of nine words: “Speaking is easy, but the tests speak stronger.”
This response had an immediate impact, triggering a series of discussions between the media and the fans of the two teams. Chivu chose not to enter the details of the matter, but made a clear reference to the fact that serious accusations should be supported by concrete tests, otherwise they risk damaging the reputation of the people involved and football itself. His short message was perceived as a warning to Gallardo to avoid making statements without foundation, remembering that in football, as in life, words may have consequences.
The implications of the accusations of Gallardo
The accusations of Gallardo are not new in a kick where corruption and external influence are themes that, unfortunately, return cyclically to the limelight. Over the years, many clubs and coaches have raised doubts about the behavior of the referees, but rarely these accusations have reached the tones as heated as those of Gallardo. The River Plate coach continued by saying that the arbitration decisions during the game were not only wrong, but seemed deliberated, suggesting that someone had had a specific interest in promoting Inter.
Many football experts, however, underlined that these accusations, without tangible evidence, risk seriously damaging the image of a prestigious club such as Inter. In addition, such an accusation against a referee could lead to penalties for the club or for the coach himself if not supported by sufficient evidence. In a system like that of Serie A, where arbitration integrity is fundamental for the credibility of the championship, these declarations risk undermining public trust in football institutions.
Inter defense and Chivu’s position
Inter, for its part, has strongly defended its position, underlining that the club has always acted in accordance with the rules and has never tried to influence the work of the referees. The club also distanced himself from the accusations of Gallardo, asking respect for his work and for the integrity of his members. Cristian Chivu confirmed this position, adding that Inter has always been a team that has tried to win with honor, without ever resorting to dishonest methods.
“Inter is a club that has built its story on the basis of solid principles, such as hard work, dedication and respect for the rules. None of our victories has ever been questioned by external factors, and we will continue to play in this way, always trying to improve,” said Chivu.
The possible consequences for Gallardo
The accusations of Gallardo could have consequences for him too. In Italy, accusing a corruption club without concrete tests is an extremely serious act, which could involve a complaint for defamation or for damage to the reputation of the club. Gallardo, despite being a successful and respected coach in Argentina, will now have to justify his statements, which may have repercussions on his career.
Some legal experts have already suggested that Gallardo could be forced to provide evidence to support his accusations, otherwise it could be subjected to penalties. However, there are also some who claim that these accusations could be seen as part of the psychological game and the tension that exists among high -class clubs.
The accusations of Marcelo Gallardo against Inter and his alleged involvement in corruption practices, followed by the lapidary response of Cristian Chivu, created an atmosphere of great uncertainty and controversy. While FIFA and the FIGC could be forced to intervene to clarify the story, the current situation suggests a possible escalation of events that could have repercussions for both parties involved.
In the meantime, Serie A and international football remain under observation, with the hope that these disputes will not further undermine the credibility of competitions and their protagonists.